In development

In development · 2026

We are building the
research platform we
kept wishing existed.

One platform for the whole primary research cycle, with a pan-India panel we are recruiting and verifying ourselves, built into it rather than bolted on. EQLOV is not live yet. This is what we are building, and where it currently stands.

In developmentPlatform
RecruitingRespondent panel
2026Target launch
Field console Preview Interface preview
Discussion guide5 sections, 22 prompts Draft
Screener logic9 conditions, 3 quota groups 42
Stimulus attached2 films, 4 pack renders 6
Client sign-offApproved by insights lead Done
Days in design3

Interface preview of what we are building. Figures shown are illustrative, not live project data.

The full cycle

One system, every stage.

Research breaks at the seams, between the recruiter, the moderator, the transcriber and the analyst. Removing those seams is the whole point of what we are building.

Stage 01

Design

Build the survey or discussion guide. Qual, quant, or both, in the same builder.

Stage 02

Recruit

Set the screening criteria. We find, verify and confirm the respondents.

Stage 03

Field

Multi-slot scheduling, calendar sync, reminders and no-show cover.

Stage 04

Analyse

Every session transcribed, searchable and highlightable by the whole team.

Stage 05

Deliver

PDF, PowerPoint, Excel or a live link. The finding leaves in the shape you need.

The platform

Designed as one system.

Six connected modules on one data layer. Some are in build, some are still on the whiteboard. Each page says which.

Survey engine

Compose

Surveys and discussion guides in endless formats. Qual and quant from one builder.

Stimulus delivery

Stage

Images, audio, video, live websites, links and PDFs, revealed on cue.

Field operations

Cadence

Multi-slot scheduling, invitations, reminders, bookings and calendars.

Panel access

Verified

A pan-India respondent panel with four verification checks before anyone joins.

Evidence layer

Archive

Transcription, highlights, tagged themes and shared insight boards.

Answer layer

Trace

Ask across every transcript at once. Every answer cites its source.

Built for teams

Six roles, one project,
different views of it.

The plan is that agencies, in-house teams, consultants, recruiters, moderators and respondents all work in the same study, with roles deciding who sees what.

  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Recruiters
  • Moderators
  • Researchers
  • Respondents
DeepReach the reason behind the answer, not just the rating.
ReadyReports that land in the meeting as-is. PDF, PPT, Excel.
UsableTied to a decision, not filed and forgotten.
TraceableEvery claim links back to the moment a real person said it.

Why we are building it

Four reasons we think
this is worth building.

REASON 01

No handoff, by design

The reason research decays is that it changes hands five times. We are building one system so the brief, the respondent, the session and the finding never leave it.

REASON 02

The panel is being built in-house

We are recruiting and verifying respondents ourselves rather than buying lists, because sample quality is the one thing no amount of software can repair later.

REASON 03

Evidence stays attached

The commitment is that every finding links back to the respondent and the timestamp, so you can check the source before you put it in front of your board.

REASON 04

Built to be handed over

Research that only its author can navigate dies in a folder. We are designing for six people on a project, not one.

Trust

Privacy decided early,
not retrofitted.

Consent, encryption and role-scoped access are being designed in from the start rather than added before a procurement review. Here is what we are committing to.

Early access

We are looking for research
teams to build this with.

If you run primary research and the problems above are yours, we want to hear how you work. Early access opens as modules become usable.